October 2006


Fiction31 Oct 2006 08:49 am

the bleak autumn sun began to wither
casting dark dancing shadows fro and hither
pale grey skies darken to night
summoning evil horrors seeking to fright
 
the bitter winds bite and howl
as demons and devils begin their prowl
along empty deserted streets they seek
stalking lost souls, the infirm, the meek
 
sniffing and smelling, searching the air
they hunt for traces of their human fare
finally they find the spoors of prey
a hapless kid named Leslie McKay
 
poor lost child stayed out too late
apparently oblivious of a horrid fate
walking the damp streets all alone
attempting to find the shortest way home
 
the creatures of night being to close in
much too eager for their feast to being
frightened Leslie screamed and tried to run
but the ghouls would not be denied their morbid fun
 
they scratch and claw and rip and tear
and sink their fangs into flesh so bare
frenzied ghasts devour the child’s tender flesh
and guzzled sweet crimson blood that ran so fresh
 
finally, at last, they end their brutal meal
and into crisp midnight’s fog slowly steal
smile, dark wraiths, through teeth they clench
and revel in death’s vile stench
copywrite roll for initiative 2006

Analysis Paralysis and Work16 Oct 2006 07:26 pm

I work, at least nominally, a 10 hour day. I say nominally because some days I work for 5 hours but on other days I work for 12; some weeks I work for 4 days but other weeks I work for 7 days straight. (I think my longest stint was 28 days straight, back when I was shipping a product.) When I’m on a normal schedule, I get to work around 7:30am and I leave around 4:30 or 5:30 (or later). Yeah my schedule is highly flexible and somewhat difficult to quantify but I think it’s safe to assume that on average I am at work around 8 - 10 hours a day.

One would think that 8 hours a day is plenty of time to get work done. I used to think that, too. However, I took a class at work a few months ago that put some things in perspective for me.

The class was an introductory class into project management. Overall, the class was pretty interesting and compelling enough to have me thinking of taking additional classes on the topic.

The instructors talked a bit about the Project Management Institute. It’s an organization whose primary focus is to research and present best known project management practices across various industries. One thing that completely blew my mind was that, according to the instructors, PMI says that when planning your project you need to take into account that a developer only works on code for 3 hours a day. That’s stable across multiple companies and across multiple industries.

So, if you have estimated that a certain component of your project is going to take 24 hours to code, you might think that it’s going to take 3 person-days (24 divided by 8 hours = 3 days). But it’s actually going to take 8 person-days (24/3 = 8 days).

As you can imagine, everyone in class was a bit skeptical of this number - and we said so to the instructors. But they didn’t budge and said that the numbers are consistent not only across our company, but across our industry, and across multiple industries. So much so that it’s an accepted figure in project management.

And that got me thinking about why I can’t seem to get anything done at work.

I think my problem is, aside from general apathy, is that I’m not the best planner in the world. I have a hard time estimating how much time it’s going to take me to do something. Unfortunately, I tend to underestimate rather than estimate, which makes making deadlines a bit “dodgy” (as the Brits would say). Not only do I have a hard time estimating how long it’ll take me to do something, I have a problem estimating how much time I’m going to have to work on said something. Astute readers will note that if you don’t have a good estimate about how long it’s going to take to do something AND you don’t have a good estimate of how much time you actually have to do said something, you really have no idea when you’re going to be done with aforementioned something.

Which is my point exactly.

In hopes of addressing this sad state of affairs, I’ve run a thought experiment to help clear up the 2nd part of that equation. Knowing how much time I have to do things will at least help me understand 1/2 the equation. I’ll deal with the other 1/2 at a later date.

Hours I have to do shit a day:

  • 2 hours in meetings on average
  • 30 minutes reading and managing quick emails
  • 30 minutes in simple/quick email responses
  • 1 hour in complex/strategic/tactical email responses
  • 1 hour for lunch
  • 30 minutes randomly talking to coworkers
  • 1 hour doing “research” online
  • 1 hour “short” work-related hallway discussions or impromptu-but-necessary meetings

That makes a total of 7 1/2 hours in a given day that I’m not actively moving my projects forward. Granted, some of that meeting and email time is project related, so let’s say that I’m spending between 6 and 7 hours a day on non-project related stuff.

Eating lunch at my desk helps free up some time, sometimes. As does cutting back on my online “research”. Though honestly, much of that is actually work related. In my job I have to be up to date on the latest games or latest consumer products and pop-cultural trends. So time spend on Gizmodo, Gamespot, Penny Arcade, Wikipedia, etc etc etc actually does make me better at my job.

But shit. That only leaves me with 1 - 4 hours a day to do actual stuff. Which don’t seem like a whole lotta time, if you ask me.

Now I’ve got to figure out how I can get better at estimating how long doing my work tasks SHOULD take. Then it’s all simple math from there, right?

Right.

Analysis Paralysis and TV and Media and Reset14 Oct 2006 09:45 am
Man, how do people do this on a daily basis?! Day in, day out, week in, week out. Sure, I may feel like I’ve got interesting things to write about (well, interesting to me, anyway), but the actual doing the writing … guh …

So, I’m just gonna throw some thoughts down without worrying too much on inconsequentials … such as grammar, spelling, coherency, or even interesting-ness.

On the plus side, I just got wireless in my new place, so that’ll make it a bit easier to throw down any old thought and turn it into a post.

For instance …

Internet access is a basic utility in 2006. In my new place, I have the basics - electricity, water/sewage, gas, garbage/recycling, etc etc etc. I opted not to get a phone land line - I figured I have a cell and don’t really need a separate home number. So phone has been downgraded to “optional”. But I absolutely had to get an internet connection. Even before I forwarded my mail to the new place I called Comcast and scheduled an appointment for the cable guy to come out and hook up those tubes up to my house.

And crazy as it may seem, I also opted out of getting cable TV. Yeah, I know … this means no more America’s Next Top Model, Amazing Race, Project Runway and all the myriad of other crappy tv shows that are near and dear to my heart.

Well, it may be a bit cognitive-dissonance-y of me, but I actually think that ANTM, AR, and PR do have some redeeming qualities. Take Tyra for instance. I used to think that supermodels were a bunch of spoiled brats doing nothing more than standing around and cashing in on their genetic good fortune. HOWEVER, Tyra has given me a much deeper appreciation for the unique skills and talent required to be … Americas Next Top Model(TM). (Yes, I did just do a cheesy promo for ANTM). For instance (man, I’m using many instances of “for instance”. I think I have a three-level-deep “for instance” structured going now…), in one episode last season (see, I’m reduced to talking about last season since I’ve gots no TV … keep up people!). Anyhoo … last season Tyra asked Sara to smile with her eyes. My immediate though was “Oh no, more Tyra BS”. I think Sara thought the same thing because when she tried to smile with her eyes, she looks like she had a piece of chicken stuck between her teeth and was concentrating on trying to dislodge it with her tongue. Tyra then steps up and does a before and after demonstration of smiling with her eyes. “I’m not smiling with my eyes” (no smile) … “Now I’m smiling with my eyes” (FREAKING HUGE SMILE-ESQUE EMOTION). I had to pause the DVR and rewind multiple times and I’m STILL not sure what she’s doing. BUT make no mistake (thanks W for contributing that into the English lexicon) … make no mistake, she wasn’t smiling and then she was smiling but her mouth didn’t move. GEE NI US!

Okay, so that was a bit random, disjointed, tangential, and dare I say … incoherent? I blame late night drinks, an inability to go to sleep, and an early morning-ish wake up calls.

On the positive side, I actually got something up here. So I guess that’s gotta count for something, right?

No catchy tagline … yet.